Annals of Oncology 12:1693-1698, 2001
© 2001 European Society for Medical Oncology
research-article |
Maspin and mammaglobin genes are specific markers for RT-PCR detection of minimal residual disease in patients with breast cancer
1Department of Hematology, Istituto Scientifico H.S. Raffaele Milan
2Department of Pathology, Istituto Scientifico H S. Raffaele Milan
3Department of Hematology, University of Torino Milan, Italy
4Medical Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Unit Istituto Nazionale Tumori, University of Milan Milan, Italy
5Department of Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milan, Italy
P. Corradini, MD, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy, E-mail: paolo.corradini{at}unimi.it
Background: This study evaluates the specificity of some reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) assays for the detection of residual tumor cells in breast cancer patients. The following markers have been analysed: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratins (CK19 and CK20), polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC-1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), maspin, and mammaglobin. RT-PCR was employed to detect breast cancer cells in peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), and stem cell leukoaphereses (PBPC).
Patients and methods: We evaluated the specificity of our RT-PCR assays on a panel of breast cancer specimens (n = 30), on PBPC in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (n = 38), on BM (n = 7) and PB (n = 5) samples obtained from patients with breast cancer. Marrow cells, PB, and PBPC from normal subjects or hematological tumor patients were tested as negative controls.
Results: Only maspin and mammaglobin met the criteria of sensitivity and specificity required for the detection of residual disease; they were expressed in 80% and 97% of breast cancer specimens, respectively, and not expressed in normal controls. CKJ9, CK20, EGFR, MUC-1, and CEA were sometimes expressed in normal blood cells and/or hematological tumors.
Conclusions: Our data support the notion that maspin and mammaglobin are useful markers for RT-PCR detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in breast cancer patients, and that perspective clinical studies are needed to determine wether RT-PCR assays will be useful in assessing prognosis, tailoring therapy, or developing new strategies for ex vivo purging.
breast cancer, mammaglobin, maspin, residual disease
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. R. Rodrigues, J. A. Teixeira, F. L. Schmitt, M. Paulsson, and H. Lindmark-Mansson The Role of Osteopontin in Tumor Progression and Metastasis in Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1087 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lacroix Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 1033 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mercatali, V. Valenti, D. Calistri, S. Calpona, G. Rosti, S. Folli, M. Gaudio, G. L. Frassineti, D. Amadori, and E. Flamini RT-PCR determination of maspin and mammaglobin B in peripheral blood of healthy donors and breast cancer patients Ann. Onc., March 1, 2006; 17(3): 424 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M Gilbey, D Burnett, R E Coleman, and I Holen The detection of circulating breast cancer cells in blood J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2004; 57(9): 903 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bregni, A. Dodero, J. Peccatori, A. Pescarollo, M. Bernardi, I. Sassi, C. Voena, A. Zaniboni, C. Bordignon, and P. Corradini Nonmyeloablative conditioning followed by hematopoietic cell allografting and donor lymphocyte infusions for patients with metastatic renal and breast cancer Blood, May 13, 2002; 99(11): 4234 - 4236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




