Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Öberg, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Öberg, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 11:707-714, 2000
© 2000 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

The interferon-{alpha} regulation of interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) and IRF-2 has therapeutic implications in carcinoid tumors

Y. Zhou, S. Wang, A. Gobl and K. Öberg

Endocrine Oncology Unit of Internal Medicine. Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala, Sweden

Correspondence to: Prof. K. Öberg, Endocrine Oncology Unit of Internal Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, S751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail: Kjell.Oberg{at}medicin.uu.se

Background: Interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) has been demonstrated to possess antiproliferative and tumor suppressor functions, on the contrary, IRF-2 has been suggested to induce oncogenetic effect in some cell lines, but not evaluated in tumor patients.

Patients and methods: In 35 carcinoid tumor patients, expressions of IRF-1 and IRF-2 were investigated by immuno-histochemistry and their values were analyzed with clinical treatment response. In carcinoid tumor cell line, Bonl, effects of IFN-{alpha} on the expression of both IRF-1 and IRF-2 mRNAs and proteins were determined by Northern blot, RNase protection assays and Western blot analysis.

Results: IFN-{alpha} up-regulated the expression of IRF-1 and IRF-2 both in vivo and in vitro. In carcinoid tumors, IFN-{alpha} treatment led to a significant increase in the expression of IRF-1 (P < 0.001) and IRF-2 (P < 0.001). Moreover, the IRFs induction was correlated with the clinical response of IFN-{alpha} treatment, although their baseline values were not predictive. In addition, expressions of IRF-1 and IRF-2 were significantly correlated with the p68 kinase expression (P = 0.032 and P = 0.0176, respectively) and the expression of IRF-1 protein was positively correlated with that of IRF-2 (r = 0.671, P = 0.0001) tested in the same specimens.

Conclusions: IRF-1 as well as IRF-2 have therapeutic implications in carcinoid tumors during treatment with inter-feron-{alpha} and IRFs induction might be used as indicators of response to treatment with interferon-{alpha}

gene expression, IRF-1 and IRF-2, p68, PKR, signal transduction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. Wang, H. D. Edington, U. N.M. Rao, D. M. Jukic, S. R. Land, S. Ferrone, and J. M. Kirkwood
Modulation of Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 1 and 3 Signaling in Melanoma by High-Dose IFN{alpha}2b
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 13(5): 1523 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. A. Kaltsas, G. M. Besser, and A. B. Grossman
The Diagnosis and Medical Management of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 458 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. Wang, L. D. Miller, G. A. Ohnmacht, S. Mocellin, A. Perez-Diez, D. Petersen, Y. Zhao, R. Simon, J. I. Powell, E. Asaki, et al.
Prospective Molecular Profiling of Melanoma Metastases Suggests Classifiers of Immune Responsiveness
Cancer Res., July 1, 2002; 62(13): 3581 - 3586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.