Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tolcher, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Rowinsky, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tolcher, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Rowinsky, E. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 11:333-338, 2000
© 2000 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

A phase I study of rhizoxin (NSC 332598) by 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors

A. W. Tolcher1,, C. Aylesworth3, J. Rizzo1, E. Izbicka1, E. Campbell1, J. Kuhn2, G. Weiss2, D. D. Von Hoff1 and E. K. Rowinsky1

1The Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research Center Texas, USA
2The Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio Texas, USA
3Brooke Army Medical Center Texas, USA
4The Audie Murphy Veterans Administration Hospital, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Correspondence to: A. W. Tolcher, MD, FRCPC, Institute for Drug Development, 250-8122 Datapoint Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA

Background: Rhizoxin (NSC 332598) is a novel macrolide antitumor antibiotic that inhibits microtubule assembly and also depolymerizes preformed microtubules. In preclinical evaluations, rhizoxin demonstrated broad antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo including both vincristine- and vindesine-resistant human lung cancers. Prolonged exposure schedules in xenograft models demonstrated optimal efficacy indicating schedule-dependent antitumor activity. The early phase I and II evaluations a five-minute bolus infusion schedule was studied, however, only modest anti-tumor activity was noted, possibly due to rapid systemic clearance. To overcome these limitations and to exploit the potential for schedule-dependent behavior of rhizoxin, the feasibility of administering rhizoxin as a 72-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion was evaluated.

Patients and methods: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were entered into this phase I study, in which both the infusion duration and dose of rhizoxin were increased. The starting dose was 0.2 mg/m2 over 12 hours administered every 3 weeks. In each successive dose level, the dose and infusion duration were incrementally increased in a stepwise fashion. Once a 72-hour i.v. infusion duration was reached, rhizoxin dose-escalations alone continued until a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined.

Results: Nineteen patients were entered into the study. Rhizoxin was administered at doses ranging from 0.2 mg/m2 i.v. over 12 hours to 2.4 mg/m2 i.v. over 72 hours every 3 weeks. The principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were severe neutropenia and mucositis, and the incidence of DLT was unacceptably high at rhizoxin doses above 1.2 mg/m2, which was determined to be the MTD and dose recommended for phase II studies. At these dose levels, rhizoxin could not be detected in the plasma by a previously validated and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography assay with a lower limit of detection of 1 ng/ml. No antitumor responses were observed.

Conclusions: Rhizoxin can be safely administered using a 72-hour i.v. infusion schedule. The toxicity profile is similar to that observed previously using brief infusion schedules. Using this protracted i.v. infusion schedule the maximum tolerated dose is 1.2 mg/m2/72 hours.

antimicrotubule, cancer, phase I, rhizoxin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. E. Loper, M. D. Henkels, B. T. Shaffer, F. A. Valeriote, and H. Gross
Isolation and Identification of Rhizoxin Analogs from Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5 by Using a Genomic Mining Strategy
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 15, 2008; 74(10): 3085 - 3093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
E. Vassal, C. Barette, X. Fonrose, R. Dupont, E. Sans-Soleilhac, and L. Lafanechere
Miniaturization and Validation of a Sensitive Multiparametric Cell-Based Assay for the Concomitant Detection of Microtubule-Destabilizing and Microtubule-Stabilizing Agents
J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2006; 11(4): 377 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. Lu, M. VanRollins, and H.-C. Lee
Stereospecific Activation of Cardiac ATP-Sensitive K+ Channels by Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids: A Structural Determinant Study
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2002; 62(5): 1076 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.