Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sobrero, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sobrero, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 11:1413-1420, 2000
© 2000 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

Schedule specific biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized study

A. Sobrero1,, A. Zaniboni2, G. L. Frassineti3, C. Aschele4, A. Guglielmi1, R. Giuliani5, A. Ravaioli6, C. Lanfranco7, C. Caroti4, E. Arnoldi8, S. Barni9, L. Gallo4, M. A. Pessi10, D. Turci11, E. Cortesi5, F. Grossi1, L. Frontini12, E. Piazza13, P. Bruzzi14, R. Labianca10 and for the GISCAD, IOR and collaborating centers

1University of Udine Udine
2Casa di Cura Poliambulanza Brescia, Italy
3Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni Forli, Italy
4Ospedale Galliera Genova, Italy
5Policlinico Umberto I, Università ‘La Sapienza’ Roma, Italy
6Ospedale degli Infermi Rimini, Italy
7Ospedale Civile di Asti Italy
8Ospedale Bolognini Seriate, Italy
9Ospedale di Treviglio Italy
10Ospedale Riuniti di Bergamo Italy
11Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci Ravenna, Italy
12Ospedale San Paolo Milano, Italy
13Ospedale Sacco Milano, Italy
14Instituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Genova, Italy

Correspondence to: Prof. A. Sobrero University of Udine Department of Medical Oncology Piazza S. Maria 1 33100 Udine Italy E-mail: sobrero{at}uniud.it

BACKGROUND: We have recently suggested that bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may work via a RNA directed mechanism while continuous infusion 5-FU may kill cells via a thymidylate synthase related pathway. It may thus be possible to selectively modulate each schedule biochemically. We have compared an alternating regimen of bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU, selectively modulated for the schedule of administration, with modulated bolus 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients from nineteen Italian centers were randomized to the control arm consisting of biweekly cycles of MTX, 200 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by bolus 5-FU 600 mg/m2 on day 2 and 6-S-leucovorin rescue, or to the experimental arm consisting of two biweekly cycles of the same regimen as in the control arm alternated to three weeks of continuous infusion 5-FU (200 mg/m2 day) + weekly bolus 6-S-leucovorin, 20 mg/m2

RESULTS: Nine CR and twenty-seven PR were obtained on one hundred eleven evaluable patients treated in experimental arm (RR = 32%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 24%–42%), while two CR and eleven PR were observed among one hunderd three evaluable patients in control arm (RR = 13%, 95% CI: 7%=21%). WHO grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 13% of cycles of experimental arm and in 8% of cycles in control arm. The PFS was significantly longer in experimental arm (6.2 vs. 4.3 months, odds ratio 0.66, P = 0.003), while the overall survival was similar in both arms (14.8 months in experimental arm vs. 14.1 months in control arm); quality of life was similar as well. Eighty percent of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy in control arm were treated with continuous infusion 5-FU.

CONCLUSIONS: Alternating, schedule-specific biochemical modulation of FU is more active than MTX -> 5-FU as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, the overall survival was similar suggesting that alternating bolus and infusional 5-FU upfront may be as effective as giving them in sequence as first- and second-line treatment.

advanced colorectal cancer, biochemical modulation, 5-fluorouracil, schedule of administration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Aschele, D. Debernardis, R. Bandelloni, S. Cascinu, V. Catalano, P. Giordani, S. Barni, D. Turci, G. Drudi, S. Lonardi, et al.
Thymidylate synthase protein expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to leucovorin-modulated bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil but not methotrexate-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2002; 13(12): 1882 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Comella, E. Crucitta, F. De Vita, L. De Lucia, A. Farris, F. Del Gaizo, S. Palmeri, A. Iannelli, S. Mancarella, S. Tafuto, et al.
Addition of either irinotecan or methotrexate to bolus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid every 2 weeks in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a randomised study by the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2002; 13(6): 866 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.