Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Gulik, T.M.
Right arrow Articles by Gouma, D.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Gulik, T.M.
Right arrow Articles by Gouma, D.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 10:S243-S246, 1999
© 1999 European Society for Medical Oncology

Local resection of biliopancreatic cancer

T.M. van Gulik, M. Gerhards, J. de Vries, R. van Geenen, L.T. de Wit, H. Obertop and D.J. Gouma

Dept.of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: T.M. van Gulik, M.D., Dept. of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, 9 Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: t.m.vangulik{at}amc.uva.nl

Biliopancreatic tumors that are potentially amenable to local resection include proximal bile duct tumors (Klatskin tumors), mid-choledochal duct tumors and tumors arising from the papilla of Vater. This paper reviews our experience in the AMC, with local resection of these conditions. From 1983–1997, 112 patients underwent surgical resection of a carcinoma of the hepatic duct sonfluence (Klatskin tumor). Local resection was undertaken in 80 patients (52 patients with type I and II tumors, and 28 patients with type III tumors) whereas in 32 patients with type IE tumors, hilar resection was performed with liver resection. Negative surgical margins were achieved in 10 patients after local resection of type I and II tumors (19.2%), in 1 patient after local resection of a type III tumor (3.6%), and in 5 patients after hilar resection and liver resection (15.6%). Middle-third carcinomas of the extra-hepatic biliary tract are less common than proximal or distal bile duct tumors.From 1993–1998,12 patients underwent resection of a midcholedochal duct carcinoma. In 8 patients, local resection was performed and in 4 patients, subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) because of the close relationship of the tumor and the pancreas. Four patients had negative surgical margins, 2 after local resection (25%) and 2 after PPPD (50%). Although accepted for villous adenomas located in the ampulla, local resection for ampullary carcinoma is controversial. Nine patients underwent local resection of a presumed adenoma that proved to be an ampullary carcinoma. In 4 patients with Tl tumors, resection of the carcinoma was locally complete (44%). Additional PPPD was performed in 6 patients, including the 4 patients with complete local resections, showing no residual tumor at the previous site of excision, but, lymphnode metastases in two resection specimens (both of patients with presumed Tl tumors). Hence, local resection of a Tl ampullary carcinoma might result in tumor free margins, but does not deal with (usually retropancreatic) lymphnode metastases. In conclusion, local resection is applicable to Klatskin type I and II tumors. Local resection may be considered in the proximally located, mid-choledochal duct carcinomas but, when located closer to the pancreas, PPPD is the preferred treatment. For ampullary adenomas, local resection is feasible unless frozen section examination raises suspicion on a malignancy. Local resection of even limited ampullary carcinomas is not advisable because of lymphatic dissemination of the tumor and consequently, inadequate clearance.

bile duct carcinoma, Klatskin tumor, local resection, papilla of Vater tumor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.