Annals of Oncology 10:397-402, 1999
© 1999 European Society for Medical Oncology
research-article |
Vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer in women 60 years of age or older
1Comprehensive Cancer Research Group Inc. Miami, FL
2Greenville Cancer Center Greenville, SC
3Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC
4New York University Medical Center New York, NY
5The Genesee Hospital Rochester, NY
6Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park NC, USA
Correspondence to: C. L.Vogel, MD, FACP, Concorde Centre II, 2999 NE 191st Street, Suite 200, Aventura, FL 33180, USA
Background: Older patients with advanced breast cancer are less likely to receive chemotherapy than younger patients. Vinorelbine is an attractive alternative in this setting because of its clinical activity and low frequency of side effects. This multicenter, phase II trial was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous vinorelbine as first-line therapy in women
60 years old.
Patients and methods: Fifty-six women (median age, 72 years; range 60-84 years), with measurable advanced breast cancer and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were enrolled and included in the analysis. Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2was administered weekly for 13 weeks and then every two weeks until development of progressive disease; doses were reduced or delayed to manage toxicity.
Results: The objective response rate was 38% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 24%-51%); median duration of response, nine months; median time to disease progression in all patients, six months. The major dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic, which led to a median dose intensity of 20.6 mg/ m2/week. Grade 34 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of asthenia (7%); nausea and generalized pain (5%); vomiting, chest pain, abdominal pain, and elevated AST (4%); fever, diarrhea, constipation, and injection site reaction (2%). Neuro-toxicity and alopecia were grade 1-2 and relatively infrequent.
Conclusions: Vinorelbine offers a promising alternative for the management of advanced breast cancer in elderly patients who are concerned about the subjective side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. The dose-limiting toxicity is neutropenia, which is readily managed with dose adjustment. Nonhematologic toxicity, including gastrointestinal side effects, is minimal. Randomized studies are warranted to compare the activity of vinorelbine with that of other regimens in elderly patients.
breast cancer, old age, vinorelbine
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U Basso, L Fratino, A Brunello, F Lumachi, G. De Salvo, S Lonardi, C Ghiotto, H Koussis, L. Pasetto, and S Monfardini Which benefit from adding gemcitabine to vinorelbine in elderly (>=70 years) women with metastatic breast cancer? Early interruption of a phase II study Ann. Onc., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 58 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Baweja, V. J. Suman, T. R. Fitch, J. A. Mailliard, A. Bernath, K. M. Rowland, S. R. Alberts, J. S. Kaur, and E. A. Perez Phase II trial of oral vinorelbine for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients >=65 years of age: an NCCTG study Ann. Onc., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 623 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Nole, C. Catania, G. Sanna, K. Imadalou, E. Munzone, L. Adamoli, B. Longerey, G. Blanchot, and A. Goldhirsch Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of an all-oral combination regimen of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine for patients with metastatic breast cancer Ann. Onc., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 322 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Toi, T. Saeki, K. Aogi, M. Sano, K. Hatake, T. Asaga, Y. Tokuda, S. Mitsuyama, M. Kimura, T. Kobayashi, et al. Late Phase II Clinical Study of Vinorelbine Monotherapy in Advanced or Recurrent Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Anthracyclines and Taxanes Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 35(6): 310 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hamilton and G. Hortobagyi Chemotherapy: What Progress in the Last 5 Years? J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1760 - 1775. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Del Mastro, F. Perrone, L. Repetto, L. Manzione, V. Zagonel, L. Fratino, D. Marenco, M. Venturini, E. Maggi, C. Bighin, et al. Weekly paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in elderly advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study of the Gruppo Italiano di Oncologia Geriatrica (GIOGer) Ann. Onc., February 1, 2005; 16(2): 253 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Welt, G. von Minckwitz, C. Oberhoff, D. Borquez, R. Schleucher, S. Loibl, A. Harstrick, M. Kaufmann, S. Seeber, and U. Vanhoefer Phase I/II study of capecitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer Ann. Onc., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 64 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Abratt, D. Brune, M.-A. Dimopoulos, J. Kliment, J. Breza, F. P. Selvaggi, P. Beuzeboc, T. Demkow, and S. Oudard Randomised phase III study of intravenous vinorelbine plus hormone therapy versus hormone therapy alone in hormone-refractory prostate cancer Ann. Onc., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 1613 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ejlertsen, H. T. Mouridsen, S. T. Langkjer, J. Andersen, J. Sjostrom, and M. Kjaer Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403) J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2313 - 2320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Freyer, T. Delozier, M. Lichinister, D. Gedouin, P. Bougnoux, P. His, K. Imadalou, and V. Trillet-Lenoir Phase II Study of Oral Vinorelbine in First-Line Advanced Breast Cancer Chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2003; 21(1): 35 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jahanzeb, J. E. Mortimer, F. Yunus, D. H. Irwin, J. Speyer, A. J. Koletsky, P. Klein, T. Sabir, and L. Kronish Phase II Trial of Weekly Vinorelbine and Trastuzumab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(5): 410 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Burstein, I. Kuter, S. M. Campos, R. S. Gelman, L. Tribou, L. M. Parker, J. Manola, J. Younger, U. Matulonis, C. A. Bunnell, et al. Clinical Activity of Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine in Women With HER2-Overexpressing Metastatic Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2001; 19(10): 2722 - 2730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Esteva, V. Valero, L. Pusztai, L. Boehnke-Michaud, A. U. Buzdar, and G. N. Hortobagyi Chemotherapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer: What to Expect in 2001 and Beyond Oncologist, April 1, 2001; 6(2): 133 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gauvin, F. Pinguet, S. Culine, C. Astre, R. Gomeni, and F. Bressolle Bayesian Estimate of Vinorelbine Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Elderly Patients with Advanced Metastatic Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 6(7): 2690 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. E. Smith, S. R. D. Johnston, M. E. R. O'Brien, T. F. Hickish, R. H. de Boer, A. Norton, D. T. Cirkel, and C. M. Barton Low-Dose Oral Fluorouracil With Eniluracil as First-Line Chemotherapy Against Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study J. Clin. Oncol., June 12, 2000; 18(12): 2378 - 2384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




