Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibrahim, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bazarbashi, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ibrahim, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bazarbashi, S. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 10:1441-1449, 1999
© 1999 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

Primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Clinical features, management, and prognosis of 185 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

E. M. Ibrahim, A. A. Ezzat, M. A. Raja, M. M. Rahal, D. S. Ajarim, B. Mann, A. Baloush, R. K. Stuart and S. N. Bazarbashi

Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence to: Ezzeldin M. Ibrahim, MD, Department of Oncology (MBC #64), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, PO Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail: ezzibrahim{at}kfshrc.edu.sa

Background: Primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PG-NHL) is common in Saudi Arabia. This has prompted the analysis of a large series of patients with PG-NHL having high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL) in order to define the clinical features and outcome of this disease.

Patients and methods: The data of all adult patients in the series with PG-NHL having DLCL histology were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were eligible if they had biopsy-confirmed diagnoses obtained by endoscopy or following laparotomy.

Results: Over a 16-year period, 185 patients with DLCL PG-NHL were identified and their data were reviewed. Patients had a median age of 54 years. In 53% of them only one initial therapeutic modality was given, while 47% were managed by a multi-modality approach. One hundred forty patients (76%), 19 (10%), and 26 (14%) attained complete remission (CR), partial remission, and no response/progressive disease, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that poor performance status and advanced stage were negatively associated with the likelihood of attaining CR. Over a median follow-up of 54 months, 118 (64%) of the patients were alive and disease-free, 17 (9%) were alive with evidence of disease, and the remaining 50 (27%) were dead. The projected 5-year and 10-year overall survivals (OS) (±SD) were 68% (±4%) and 61% (±6%), respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model identified the same variables of response as adverse prognostic factors of survival. Using the influence of performance status, and stage, a prognostic index was constructed to recognize three prognostically distinctive risk categories with overall survival proportions of 87%, 61%, and 45%, respectively. The unadjusted International Prognostic Index, however, failed to classify patients into prognostically meaningful risk strata. Of the 140 patients who achieved CR, the median disease-free survival (DFS) was not reached, but the predicted 5- and 10-year DFS were 82% and 75%, respectively. A multivariate analysis identified poor performance status as the only independent prognostic covariate that adversely influenced DFS. Our analysis showed that compared with single-modality management, multi-modality strategy attained significantly higher CR, and advantageous OS and DFS.

Conclusions: This large series characterized the clinicopathologic features and outcome of patients with DLCL PG-NHL. Performance status, and stage significantly influenced patient outcome. A prognostic index was developed and it identified three prognostically distinctive risk groups; however, prospective validation is warranted.

gastric, large cell, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
F Di Raimondo, L Caruso, G Bonanno, P Naso, A Chiarenza, P Fiumara, A Bari, G. Palumbo, A Russo, and R Giustolisi
Is endoscopic ultrasound clinically useful for follow-up of gastric lymphoma?
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 351 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
E. Ibrahim and A. Ezzat
Failure of the International Prognostic Index to prognosticate outcome in primary gastric DLBC lymphoma
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 841 - 841.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J.-C. Delchier
Reply to Letter to the Editor on "Surgical resection plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone: comparison of two strategies to treat diffuse large B-cell gastric lymphoma", by M. Binn, A. Ruskone-Fourmestraux, E. Lepage et al. (Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 1751-1757)
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 842 - 842.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Binn, A. Ruskone-Fourmestraux, E. Lepage, C. Haioun, A. Delmer, P. Aegerter, A. Lavergne, C. Guettier, and J.-C. Delchier
Surgical resection plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone: comparison of two strategies to treat diffuse large B-cell gastric lymphoma
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2003; 14(12): 1751 - 1757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Raderer, A. Chott, J. Drach, C. Montalban, B. Dragosics, U. Jager, A. Puspok, C. Osterreicher, and C. C. Zielinski
Chemotherapy for management of localised high-grade gastric B-cell lymphoma: how much is necessary?
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2002; 13(7): 1094 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.