Annals of Oncology 10:1185-1189, 1999
© 1999 European Society for Medical Oncology
research-article |
Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F18-FDG) does not visualize extranodal B-cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type
1Departments of Nuclear Medicine University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
2Departments of Internal Medicine I University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
3Departments of Internal Medicine IV University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
4Departments of Clinical Pathology, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
Correspondence to: M. Raderer, MD Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Oncology University of Vienna Waehringer Guertel 1820 A-1090 Vienna Austria E-mail: Markus.Raderer{at}akh-wien.ac.at
Background: On the basis of promising data on the use of fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F18-FDG) whole body positron emission tomography (WB-FDG-PET) in the staging of patients with lymphoma, we initiated a pilot series to evaluate the role of WB-FDG-PET in the staging of extranodal B-cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type.
Patients and methods: We examined ten consecutive patients with histologically-verified MALT-type lymphomas of various origin before initiation of therapy. Nine patients had low-grade lymphomas (five cases of gastric lymphoma, two patients with lymphoma arising in the lung, one parotid and one lacrimal gland lymphoma, while one patient had a high-grade gastric lymphoma arising from a low-grade background. Two patients had stage El, seven had stage EII disease, and one presented with stage EIII. WB-FDG-PET scans were performed 40 min following the injection of 300380 MBq of F18-FDG. The PET scans were correlated with extensive conventional staging including ophthalmologic investigation, otolaryngologic examination, gastroscopy, endosonography, enteroclysis, colonoscopy, CT of thorax and abdomen, and bone marrow biopsy.
Results: WB-FDG-PET documented no lymphoma in any of the 10 patients studied, as no focal tracer uptake was demonstrated in either gastric or extragastric lesions or in involved lymph nodes, irrespective of histologic grading. In three patients the scan showed a false negative result with respect to the MALT lesions but showed focal tracer uptake indicating tumor spread, which, however, was ruled out by further follow-up and biopsy, respectively, and was thus rated false positive. Due to these results, the study was discontinued prematurely after the first ten patients.
Conclusions: These discouraging results indicated that WB-FDG-PET is not useful for staging and follow-up of MALT-type lymphoma, and should therefore not be included in the clinical decision making process.
F-18 FDG-PET, MALT-lymphoma
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Y. Y. Ngeow, R. H. H. Quek, D. C. E. Ng, S. W. Hee, M. Tao, L. C. Lim, Y. H. Tan, and S. T. Lim High SUV uptake on FDG-PET/CT predicts for an aggressive B-cell lymphoma in a prospective study of primary FDG-PET/CT staging in lymphoma Ann. Onc., September 1, 2009; 20(9): 1543 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Maksimovic, W. A. Bethge, J. P. Pintoffl, M. Vogel, C. D. Claussen, R. Bares, and M. Horger Marginal Zone B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Type: Imaging Findings Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 921 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. A Bae, K. S. Lee, J. Han, Y.-H. Ko, B.-T. Kim, M. J. Chung, and T. S. Kim Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma of Bronchus-Associated Lymphoid Tissue*: Imaging Findings in 21 Patients Chest, February 1, 2008; 133(2): 433 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Kwee, R. M. Kwee, and R. A. J. Nievelstein Imaging in staging of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 504 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Seam, M. E. Juweid, and B. D. Cheson The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma Blood, November 15, 2007; 110(10): 3507 - 3516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kako, K. Izutsu, Y. Ota, Y. Minatani, M. Sugaya, T. Momose, K. Ohtomo, Y. Kanda, S. Chiba, T. Motokura, et al. FDG-PET in T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms Ann. Onc., October 1, 2007; 18(10): 1685 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tsai, S Li, A. Ng, B Silver, M. Stevenson, and P. Mauch Role of radiation therapy in the treatment of stage I/II mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma Ann. Onc., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 672 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Juweid, S. Stroobants, O. S. Hoekstra, F. M. Mottaghy, M. Dietlein, A. Guermazi, G. A. Wiseman, L. Kostakoglu, K. Scheidhauer, A. Buck, et al. Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2007; 25(5): 571 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Cheson, B. Pfistner, M. E. Juweid, R. D. Gascoyne, L. Specht, S. J. Horning, B. Coiffier, R. I. Fisher, A. Hagenbeek, E. Zucca, et al. Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2007; 25(5): 579 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Hoffmann, S Wohrer, A Becherer, A Chott, B Streubel, K Kletter, and M Raderer 18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue: histology makes the difference Ann. Onc., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 1761 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hadithi, M. Mallant, J. Oudejans, J.-H. T.M. van Waesberghe, C. J. Mulder, and E. F.I. Comans 18F-FDG PET Versus CT for the Detection of Enteropathy-Associated T-Cell Lymphoma in Refractory Celiac Disease J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 1622 - 1627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Beal, H. W. Yeung, and J. Yahalom FDG-PET scanning for detection and staging of extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of the MALT type: a report of 42 cases Ann. Onc., March 1, 2005; 16(3): 473 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kazama, S. C. Faria, V. Varavithya, S. Phongkitkarun, H. Ito, and H. A. Macapinlac FDG PET in the Evaluation of Treatment for Lymphoma: Clinical Usefulness and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 191 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kumar, Y. Xiu, S. Potenta, A. Mavi, H. Zhuang, J. Q. Yu, T. Dhurairaj, S. Dadparvar, and A. Alavi 18F-FDG PET for Evaluation of the Treatment Response in Patients with Gastrointestinal Tract Lymphomas J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1796 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Rohren, T. G. Turkington, and R. E. Coleman Clinical Applications of PET in Oncology Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 305 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Friedberg and V. Chengazi PET Scans in the Staging of Lymphoma: Current Status Oncologist, October 1, 2003; 8(5): 438 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Elstrom, L. Guan, G. Baker, K. Nakhoda, J.-A. Vergilio, H. Zhuang, S. Pitsilos, A. Bagg, L. Downs, A. Mehrotra, et al. Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification Blood, May 15, 2003; 101(10): 3875 - 3876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Hoffmann, H Vogelsang, K Kletter, G Zettinig, A Chott, and M Raderer 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) for assessment of enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma Gut, March 1, 2003; 52(3): 347 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kostakoglu, H. Agress Jr, and S. J. Goldsmith Clinical Role of FDG PET in Evaluation of Cancer Patients RadioGraphics, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 315 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kostakoglu and S. J. Goldsmith 18F-FDG PET Evaluation of the Response to Therapy for Lymphoma and for Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Carcinoma J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 224 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zettinig, A. Becherer, M. Szabo, M. Uffmann, R. Dudczak, P. Valent, and K. Kletter FDG Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Systemic Mastocytosis Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1235 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Trojan, M. Jermann, C. Taverna, and T. F. Hany Fusion PET-CT imaging of neurolymphomatosis Ann. Onc., May 1, 2002; 13(5): 802 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Gambhir, J. Czernin, J. Schwimmer, D. H. S. Silverman, R. E. Coleman, and M. E. Phelps A Tabulated Summary of the FDG PET Literature J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2001; 42(90050): 1S - 93. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Lugtenburg, B. Löwenberg, R. Valkema, H.-Y. Oei, S. W. Lamberts, M. J. Eijkemans, W. L. van Putten, and E. P. Krenning Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy in the Initial Staging of Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 222 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||









