Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (69)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Decoster, G.
Right arrow Articles by Holdener, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Decoster, G.
Right arrow Articles by Holdener, E. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 1:175-181, 1990
© 1990 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

Responses and toxic deaths in Phase I clinical trials*

G. Decoster1,, G. Stein2 and E. E. Holdener1

1Department of Clinical Research, Division of Oncology, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd CH-4002 Basle, Switzerland
2Statistics for Research, SFR Ltd CH-4051 Basle, Switzerland

Correspondence to: Genevieve Decoster, M.D. Department of Clinical Research-Oncology F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd Grenzacherstrasse 124 CH-4002 Basle, Switzerland

This review analysis consists of the antitumor activity and toxic deaths reported in single agent Phase I clinical trials using cytotoxic compounds published from 1972 to 1987. A total of 6639 patients with a variety of solid tumors and hematological malignancies were accrued in 211 trials studying 87 compounds. The median number of patients per trial was 28 (range: 7–111) and the median of the median ages reported in the individual trial was 56 (range of individual age: 2 to 93 years). Ten percent of the trials enrolled pediatric patients (< 18 years), but the exact numbers of children were not always given or separated from the adult patients. Nine percent of the patients had received no prior treatment, 75% were pretreated either with chemotherapy alone (50%) or radio- plus chemotherapy (25%). Radiotherapy alone was adminis-tered to 11% of the patients and the remaining 5% of the patients received prior treatments which was not specified. The most frequent tumor types were those of the gastrointestinal tract (22%) and the respiratory tract (19%). The frequency of the remaining malignancies was < 10% of all patients. There were 23 (0.3%) complete responders and 279 (4.2%) partial responders for an overall response rate of 4.5% among all entries. Toxic deaths were rare and reported in only 31 patients (0.5% of the entire population). Responses were usually observed in chemosensitive tumor types. Despite a low response rate reported during the first phase of cytotoxic drug development, the present analysis shows that some therapeutic benefit can be achieved.

Phase I trials response data, toxic deaths


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Abdoler, H. Taylor, and D. Wendler
The Ethics of Phase 0 Oncology Trials
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3692 - 3697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Italiano, C. Massard, R. Bahleda, A.-L. Vataire, E. Deutsch, N. Magne, J.-P. Pignon, G. Vassal, J.-P. Armand, and J.-C. Soria
Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 787 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. Seidenfeld, E. Horstmann, E. J. Emanuel, and C. Grady
Participants in Phase 1 Oncology Research Trials: Are They Vulnerable?
Arch Intern Med, January 14, 2008; 168(1): 16 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. Markman
"Therapeutic intent" in phase 1 oncology trials: a justifiable objective.
Arch Intern Med, July 24, 2006; 166(14): 1446 - 1448.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Joffe and F. G. Miller
Rethinking Risk-Benefit Assessment for Phase I Cancer Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 24(19): 2987 - 2990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. P. Lee, J. M. Skolnik, and P. C. Adamson
Pediatric Phase I Trials in Oncology: An Analysis of Study Conduct Efficiency
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8431 - 8441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. Horstmann, M. S. McCabe, L. Grochow, S. Yamamoto, L. Rubinstein, T. Budd, D. Shoemaker, E. J. Emanuel, and C. Grady
Risks and Benefits of Phase 1 Oncology Trials, 1991 through 2002
N. Engl. J. Med., March 3, 2005; 352(9): 895 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. G. Roberts Jr, B. H. Goulart, L. Squitieri, S. C. Stallings, E. F. Halpern, B. A. Chabner, G. S. Gazelle, S. N. Finkelstein, and J. W. Clark
Trends in the Risks and Benefits to Patients With Cancer Participating in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
JAMA, November 3, 2004; 292(17): 2130 - 2140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. X. Chen and I. F. Tannock
Risks and Benefits of Phase 1 Clinical Trials Evaluating New Anticancer Agents: A Case for More Innovation
JAMA, November 3, 2004; 292(17): 2150 - 2151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
A. Chang
Nurses' Perceptions of Phase I Clinical Trials in Pediatric Oncology: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, November 1, 2004; 21(6): 343 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Rogatko, J. S. Babb, H. Wang, M. J. Slifker, and G. R. Hudes
Patient Characteristics Compete with Dose as Predictors of Acute Treatment Toxicity in Early Phase Clinical Trials
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2004; 10(14): 4645 - 4651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. Agrawal and E. J. Emanuel
Ethics of Phase 1 Oncology Studies: Reexamining the Arguments and Data
JAMA, August 27, 2003; 290(8): 1075 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Horng, E. J. Emanuel, B. Wilfond, J. Rackoff, K. Martz, and C. Grady
Descriptions of Benefits and Risks in Consent Forms for Phase 1 Oncology Trials
N. Engl. J. Med., December 26, 2002; 347(26): 2134 - 2140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. D. Pentz, A. L. Flamm, J. Sugarman, M. Z. Cohen, G. Daniel Ayers, R. S. Herbst, and J. L. Abbruzzese
Study of the Media's Potential Influence on Prospective Research Participants' Understanding of and Motivations for Participation in a High-Profile Phase I Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2002; 20(18): 3785 - 3791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. C. Lintz, R. T. Penson, B. A. Chabner, S. Mack, and T. J. Lynch Jr.
A Staff Dialogue on Phase I Trials: Psychosocial Issues Faced by Patients, Their Families, and Caregivers
Oncologist, June 1, 2002; 7(90002): 8 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
K. Cox
The hopes of the dying: Examining patients' experience of participation in early phase cancer clinical trials
Journal of Research in Nursing, January 1, 2002; 7(1): 60 - 73.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. D. Cheng, J. Hitt, B. Koczwara, K. A. Schulman, C. B. Burnett, D. J. Gaskin, J. H. Rowland, and N. J. Meropol
Impact of Quality of Life on Patient Expectations Regarding Phase I Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., January 14, 2000; 18(2): 421 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. C. Lintz, R. T. Penson, B. A. Chabner, S. Mack, and T. J. Lynch
A Staff Dialogue on Phase I Trials: Psychosocial Issues Faced by Patients, Their Families, and Caregivers
Oncologist, October 1, 1998; 3(5): 357 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.